Starp eksāmeniem

Dažreiz zinātniskā literatūra ir patiesi izklaidējoša:

                   The “antiplume lobby” (the name given neatly by Saunders [63]) has attacked the plume theory on several fronts. At times, the arguments of various parties, particularly of plume opponents, may seem to be passionate and even biased. This is reflected in the colorful rhetoric of the debate, often departing from academic style: “the plume myth,” “a nail into the coffin of plumes,” “the love affair with plumes,” “hell of a plume,” etc.

(Puchkov, 2009)

"Mantle plumes" (piedodiet, nav ne jausmas, kā tulkot latviski) (Arndt, 2000)


Puchkov V.N. (2009). The Controversy over Plumes: Who Is Actually Right? Geotectonics, Vol. 43., no. 1, pp. 1-17.

Arndt N. (2000). Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails. Nature 407, 458-461.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Mainīt )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: